Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-01-11 11:55:00
Also in:
kvm, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, lkml, virtualization
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:31:37AM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:44 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:24:40PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:10 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:54:08PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:57 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:17:24PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:quoted
This series introduces a framework that makes it possible to implement software-emulated vDPA devices in userspace. And to make the device emulation more secure, the emulated vDPA device's control path is handled in the kernel and only the data path is implemented in the userspace. Since the emuldated vDPA device's control path is handled in the kernel, a message mechnism is introduced to make userspace be aware of the data path related changes. Userspace can use read()/write() to receive/reply the control messages. In the data path, the core is mapping dma buffer into VDUSE daemon's address space, which can be implemented in different ways depending on the vdpa bus to which the vDPA device is attached. In virtio-vdpa case, we implements a MMU-based software IOTLB with bounce-buffering mechanism to achieve that. And in vhost-vdpa case, the dma buffer is reside in a userspace memory region which can be shared to the VDUSE userspace processs via transferring the shmfd. The details and our user case is shown below: ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- | Container | | QEMU(VM) | | VDUSE daemon | | --------- | | ------------------- | | ------------------------- ---------------- | | |dev/vdx| | | |/dev/vhost-vdpa-x| | | | vDPA device emulation | | block driver | | ------------+----------- -----------+------------ -------------+----------------------+--------- | | | | | | | | ------------+---------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------+--------- | | block device | | vhost device | | vduse driver | | TCP/IP | | | -------+-------- --------+-------- -------+-------- -----+---- | | | | | | | | ----------+---------- ----------+----------- -------+------- | | | | virtio-blk driver | | vhost-vdpa driver | | vdpa device | | | | ----------+---------- ----------+----------- -------+------- | | | | virtio bus | | | | | --------+----+----------- | | | | | | | | | | | ----------+---------- | | | | | | virtio-blk device | | | | | | ----------+---------- | | | | | | | | | | | -----------+----------- | | | | | | virtio-vdpa driver | | | | | | -----------+----------- | | | | | | | | vdpa bus | | | -----------+----------------------+---------------------------+------------ | | | ---+--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| NIC |------ ---+--- | ---------+--------- | Remote Storages | ------------------- We make use of it to implement a block device connecting to our distributed storage, which can be used both in containers and VMs. Thus, we can have an unified technology stack in this two cases. To test it with null-blk: $ qemu-storage-daemon \ --chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/tmp/qmp.sock,server,nowait \ --monitor chardev=charmonitor \ --blockdev driver=host_device,cache.direct=on,aio=native,filename=/dev/nullb0,node-name=disk0 \ --export type=vduse-blk,id=test,node-name=disk0,writable=on,name=vduse-null,num-queues=16,queue-size=128 The qemu-storage-daemon can be found at https://github.com/bytedance/qemu/tree/vduseIt's been half a year - any plans to upstream this?Yeah, this is on my to-do list this month. Sorry for taking so long... I've been working on another project enabling userspace RDMA with VDUSE for the past few months. So I didn't have much time for this. Anyway, I will submit the first version as soon as possible. Thanks, YongjiOh fun. You mean like virtio-rdma? Or RDMA as a backend for regular virtio?Yes, like virtio-rdma. Then we can develop something like userspace rxe、siw or custom protocol with VDUSE. Thanks, YongjiWould be interesting to see the spec for that.Will send it ASAP.quoted
The issues with RDMA revolved around the fact that current apps tend to either use non-standard propocols for connection establishment or use UD where there's IIRC no standard at all. So QP numbers are hard to virtualize. Similarly many use LIDs directly with the same effect. GUIDs might be virtualizeable but no one went to the effort.Actually we aimed at emulating a soft RDMA with normal NIC (not use RDMA capability) rather than virtualizing a physical RDMA NIC into several vRDMA devices. If so, I think we won't have those issues, right?
Right, maybe you won't.
quoted
To say nothing about the interaction with memory overcommit.I don't get you here. Could you give me more details? Thanks, Yongji
RDMA devices tend to want to pin the memory under DMA. -- MST