Re: [PATCH net] can: isotp: isotp_rcv_cf(): fix so->rx race problem
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Date: 2022-01-27 19:44:25
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
Hello Ziyang Xuan, On 21.01.22 02:50, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
quoted
On 20.01.22 12:28, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:quoted
quoted
On 20.01.22 07:24, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:quoted
I have reproduced the syz problem with Marc's commit, the commit can not fix the panic problem. So I tried to find the root cause for panic and gave my solution. Marc's commit just fix the condition that packet size bigger than INT_MAX which trigger tpcon::{idx,len} integer overflow, but the packet size is 4096 in the syz problem. so->rx.len is 0 after the following logic in isotp_rcv_ff(): /* get the FF_DL */ so->rx.len = (cf->data[ae] & 0x0F) << 8; so->rx.len += cf->data[ae + 1]; so->rx.len is 4096 after the following logic in isotp_rcv_ff(): /* FF_DL = 0 => get real length from next 4 bytes */ so->rx.len = cf->data[ae + 2] << 24; so->rx.len += cf->data[ae + 3] << 16; so->rx.len += cf->data[ae + 4] << 8; so->rx.len += cf->data[ae + 5];In these cases the values 0 could be the minimum value in so->rx.len - but e.g. the value 0 can not show up in isotp_rcv_cf() as this function requires so->rx.state to be ISOTP_WAIT_DATA.Consider the scenario that isotp_rcv_cf() and isotp_rcv_cf() are concurrent for the same isotp_sock as following sequence:o_O Sorry but the receive path is not designed to handle concurrent receptions that would run isotp_rcv_cf() and isotp_rcv_ff() simultaneously.quoted
isotp_rcv_cf() if (so->rx.state != ISOTP_WAIT_DATA) [false] isotp_rcv_ff() so->rx.state = ISOTP_IDLE /* get the FF_DL */ [so->rx.len == 0] alloc_skb() [so->rx.len == 0] /* FF_DL = 0 => get real length from next 4 bytes */ [so->rx.len == 4096] skb_put(nskb, so->rx.len) [so->rx.len == 4096] skb_over_panic()Even though this case is not possible with a real CAN bus due to the CAN frame transmission times we could introduce some locking (or dropping of concurrent CAN frames) in isotp_rcv() - but this code runs in net softirq context ...
As discussed off-list I added a spin_lock() in isotp_rcv() as https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/kernel-locking/lock-softirqs.html suggests. Please give this patch[1] a try in your test setup. Many thanks, Oliver [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20220127192429.336335-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/T/ (local)