Re: [PATCH crypto 1/2] lib/crypto: blake2s-generic: reduce code size on small systems

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:32 PM Eric Biggers [off-list ref] wrote:

How about unrolling the inner loop but not the outer one?  Wouldn't that give
most of the benefit, without hurting performance as much?

If you stay with this approach and don't unroll either loop, can you use 'r' and
'i' instead of 'i' and 'j', to match the naming in G()?

All this might work, sure. But as mentioned earlier, I've abandoned
this entirely, as I don't think this patch is necessary. See the v3
patchset instead:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20220111220506.742067-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ (local)