Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Jerome Pouiller
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Note that the values used by Silabs are uncommon. A driver cannot fully
rely on the SDIO PnP. It should also check if the device is declared in
the DT.
So, to apply the quirks necessary for the Silabs WF200, we rely on the
DT rather than on the SDIO VID/PID.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
I guess the series is getting close to getting queued up?
As an option to make sure $subject patch doesn't cause a problem for
that, I can queue it up and send it for the 5.17-rcs or if Kalle
prefer to carry this in this tree with my ack?
Kalle?
The easiest is if you can take it to your tree, tack!
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches