Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-30

Re: [wpan-next 2/4] net: mac802154: Include the softMAC stack inside the IEEE 802.15.4 menu

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Date: 2022-01-28 14:04:20
Also in: linux-wireless

Hi Stefan,

stefan@datenfreihafen.org wrote on Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:35:00 +0100:
Hello.

On 27.01.22 17:54, Miquel Raynal wrote:
quoted
Hi Stefan,

stefan@datenfreihafen.org wrote on Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:04:41 +0100:
  
quoted
Hello.

On 20.01.22 01:43, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
quoted
From: David Girault <redacted>

The softMAC stack has no meaning outside of the IEEE 802.15.4 stack and
cannot be used without it.

Signed-off-by: David Girault <redacted>
[miquel.raynal@bootlin.com: Isolate this change from a bigger commit]
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
   net/Kconfig            | 1 -
   net/ieee802154/Kconfig | 1 +
   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 0da89d09ffa6..a5e31078fd14 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ source "net/x25/Kconfig"
   source "net/lapb/Kconfig"
   source "net/phonet/Kconfig"
   source "net/6lowpan/Kconfig"
-source "net/mac802154/Kconfig"
   source "net/sched/Kconfig"
   source "net/dcb/Kconfig"
   source "net/dns_resolver/Kconfig"
diff --git a/net/ieee802154/Kconfig b/net/ieee802154/Kconfig
index 31aed75fe62d..7e4b1d49d445 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/Kconfig
+++ b/net/ieee802154/Kconfig
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ config IEEE802154_SOCKET
   	  for 802.15.4 dataframes. Also RAW socket interface to build MAC
   	  header from userspace.  
   > +source "net/mac802154/Kconfig"  
   source "net/ieee802154/6lowpan/Kconfig"  
   >   endif  
   >>  
Please fold this patch into the previous one moving the Kconfig option around. This can be done in one go.  
Sure.

By the way, I was questioning myself: why is the mac802154 folder
outside of ieee802154? I don't really understand the organization but
as it would massively prevent any of the future changes that I already
prepared to apply correctly, I haven't proposed such a move -yet. But
I would like to know what's the idea behind the current folder
hierarchy?  
The directory structure has been in place from the initial merge of the subsystem, before Alex and myself took on the maintainer roles.

I see no reason for a move though. The extra burden for backports, etc outweigh the urge of cleanliness on the folder structure. :-)
That's fair.
The Kconfig cleanup and move of the file is worth doing, the move of the whole source code folder not.
I agree there is more interesting and less impacting to do in the area,
I was just wondering about that choice.

Thanks,
Miquèl
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help