On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:54:04 +0100 (CET) Justin Iurman wrote:

quoted

quoted

The function kmem_cache_size is used to retrieve the size of a slab
object. Note that it returns the "object_size" field, not the "size"
field. If needed, a new function (e.g., kmem_cache_full_size) could be
added to return the "size" field. To match the definition from the
draft, the number of bytes is computed as follows:

slabinfo.active_objs * size

Implementing the standard is one thing but how useful is this
in practice?  

IMHO, very useful. To be honest, if I were to implement only a few data
fields, these two would be both included. Take the example of CLT [1]
where the queue length data field is used to detect low-level issues
from inside a L5-7 distributed tracing tool. And this is just one
example among many others. The queue length data field is very specific
to TX queues, but we could also use the buffer occupancy data field to
detect more global loads on a node. Actually, the goal for operators
running their IOAM domain is to quickly detect a problem along a path
and react accordingly (human or automatic action). For example, if you
monitor TX queues along a path and detect an increasing queue on a
router, you could choose to, e.g.,  rebalance its queues. With the
buffer occupancy, you could detect high-loaded nodes in general and,
e.g., rebalance traffic to another branch. Again, this is just one
example among others. Apart from more accurate ECMPs, you could for
instance deploy a smart (micro)service selection based on different
metrics, etc.

  [1] https://github.com/Advanced-Observability/cross-layer-telemetry

Ack, my question was more about whether the metric as implemented
provides the best signal. Since the slab cache scales dynamically
(AFAIU) it's not really a big deal if it's full as long as there's
memory available on the system.