On 2021/12/25 4:32 PM, Qiang Wang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
If repeated legacy kprobes on same function in one process,
libbpf will register using the same probe name and got -EBUSY
error. So append index to the probe name format to fix this
problem.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Wang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <redacted>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b7d6c951fa09..0c41a45ffd54 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -9634,7 +9634,9 @@ static int append_to_file(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...)
static void gen_kprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz,
const char *kfunc_name, size_t offset)
{
- snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset);
+ static int index = 0;
Add empty line after variable declaration.
+ snprintf(buf, buf_sz, "libbpf_%u_%s_0x%zx_%d", getpid(), kfunc_name, offset
Missing a comma after offset.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ __sync_fetch_and_add(&index, 1));
}
static int add_kprobe_event_legacy(const char *probe_name, bool retprobe,