Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-14

RE: [PATCH] lib/x86: Optimise csum_partial of buffers that are not multiples of 8 bytes.

flat view

From: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Date: 2021-12-13 18:40:27
Also in: lkml

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: David Laight <redacted>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 10:01 AM
To: 'Noah Goldstein' <redacted>; 'Eric Dumazet'
[off-list ref]
Cc: 'tglx@linutronix.de' <redacted>; 'mingo@redhat.com'
[off-list ref]; 'Borislav Petkov' [off-list ref];
'dave.hansen@linux.intel.com' [off-list ref]; 'X86 ML'
[off-list ref]; 'hpa@zytor.com' [off-list ref];
'peterz@infradead.org' [off-list ref]; Alexander Duyck
[off-list ref]; 'open list' [off-list ref];
'netdev' [off-list ref]
Subject: [PATCH] lib/x86: Optimise csum_partial of buffers that are not
multiples of 8 bytes.


Add in the trailing bytes first so that there is no need to worry about the sum
exceeding 64 bits.

Signed-off-by: David Laight <redacted>
---

This ought to be faster - because of all the removed 'adc $0'.
Guessing how fast x86 code will run is hard!
There are other ways of handing buffers that are shorter than 8 bytes, but I'd
rather hope they don't happen in any hot paths.

Note - I've not even compile tested it.
(But have tested an equivalent change before.)

 arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c | 55 ++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
index abf819dd8525..fbcc073fc2b5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
@@ -37,6 +37,24 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len,
__wsum sum)
 	u64 temp64 = (__force u64)sum;
 	unsigned result;

+	if (len & 7) {
+		if (unlikely(len < 8)) {
+			/* Avoid falling off the start of the buffer */
+			if (len & 4) {
+				temp64 += *(u32 *)buff;
+				buff += 4;
+			}
+			if (len & 2) {
+				temp64 += *(u16 *)buff;
+				buff += 2;
+			}
+			if (len & 1)
+				temp64 += *(u8 *)buff;
+			goto reduce_to32;
+		}
+		temp64 += *(u64 *)(buff + len - 8) << (8 - (len & 7)) * 8;
+	}
+
I don't think your shift is headed in the right direction. If your starting offset is "buff + len - 8" then your remaining bits should be in the upper bytes of the qword, not the lower bytes shouldn't they? So I would think it should be ">>" not "<<".
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	while (unlikely(len >= 64)) {
 		asm("addq 0*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
 		    "adcq 1*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
@@ -82,43 +100,8 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len,
__wsum sum)
 			: "memory");
 		buff += 8;
 	}
-	if (len & 7) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
-		unsigned int shift = (8 - (len & 7)) * 8;
-		unsigned long trail;
-
-		trail = (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
Your code above should be equivalent to the load_unaligned_zeropad() << shift, so the shift you are performing above is equivalent to the later one.
-		asm("addq %[trail],%[res]\n\t"
-		    "adcq $0,%[res]"
-			: [res] "+r" (temp64)
-			: [trail] "r" (trail));
-#else
-		if (len & 4) {
-			asm("addq %[val],%[res]\n\t"
-			    "adcq $0,%[res]"
-				: [res] "+r" (temp64)
-				: [val] "r" ((u64)*(u32 *)buff)
-				: "memory");
-			buff += 4;
-		}
-		if (len & 2) {
-			asm("addq %[val],%[res]\n\t"
-			    "adcq $0,%[res]"
-				: [res] "+r" (temp64)
-				: [val] "r" ((u64)*(u16 *)buff)
-				: "memory");
-			buff += 2;
-		}
-		if (len & 1) {
-			asm("addq %[val],%[res]\n\t"
-			    "adcq $0,%[res]"
-				: [res] "+r" (temp64)
-				: [val] "r" ((u64)*(u8 *)buff)
-				: "memory");
-		}
-#endif
-	}
+reduce_to32:
 	result = add32_with_carry(temp64 >> 32, temp64 & 0xffffffff);
 	return (__force __wsum)result;
 }
--
2.17.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes,
MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help