Re: [PATCH v2] samples/bpf: xdpsock: fix swap.cocci warning
flat view
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-13 12:09:48
Also in:
bpf, lkml
Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] writes:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:07 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:26 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Yihao Han [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Fix following swap.cocci warning: ./samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:528:22-23: WARNING opportunity for swap() Signed-off-by: Yihao Han <redacted>Erm, did this get applied without anyone actually trying to compile samples? I'm getting build errors as:Good news: I actually do build samples/bpf nowadays after fixing a bunch of compilation issues recently.Awesome!quoted
Bad news: seems like I didn't pay too much attention after building samples/bpf for this particular patch, sorry about that. I've dropped this patch, samples/bpf builds for me. We should be good now.Yup, looks good, thanks!quoted
quoted
CC /home/build/linux/samples/bpf/xsk_fwd.o /home/build/linux/samples/bpf/xsk_fwd.c: In function ‘swap_mac_addresses’: /home/build/linux/samples/bpf/xsk_fwd.c:658:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘swap’; did you mean ‘swab’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 658 | swap(*src_addr, *dst_addr); | ^~~~ | swab /usr/bin/ld: /home/build/linux/samples/bpf/xsk_fwd.o: in function `thread_func': xsk_fwd.c:(.text+0x440): undefined reference to `swap' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Could we maybe get samples/bpf added to the BPF CI builds? :)Maybe we could, if someone dedicated their effort towards making this happen.Is it documented anywhere what that would entail? Is it just a matter of submitting a change to https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest ?I think the right way would be to build samples/bpf from selftests/bpf's Makefile. At the very least we should not require make headers_install (I never understood that with samples/bpf, all those up-to-date UAPI headers are right there in the same repo). Once that is done, at the very least we'll build tests samples/bpf during CI runs.
Alright, sounds fair. I'll look into that, but probably before the holidays :) -Toke