Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for qca8k mdio rw in Ethernet packet

I considered a simplified form like this, but I think the tagger private
data will still stay in dp->priv, only its ownership will change.

Isn't dp a port structure. So there is one per port?

This is where i think we need to separate shared state from tagger
private data. Probably tagger private data is not per port. Shared
state between the switch driver and the tagger maybe is per port?

      Andrew