Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: expose ocelot wm functions
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Date: 2021-12-07 16:40:38
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:39:00AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:30:12 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote:quoted
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:26:52AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:11:22 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote:quoted
I'm not taking this as a spiteful comment either, it is a very fair point. Colin had previously submitted this as part of a 23-patch series and it was me who suggested that this change could go in as part of preparation work right away: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20211116062328.1949151-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com/#24596529 I didn't realize that in doing so with this particular change, we would end up having some symbols exported by the ocelot switch lib that aren't yet in use by other drivers. So yes, this would have to go in at the same time as the driver submission itself.I don't know the dependencies here (there are also pinctrl patches in the linked series) so I'll defer to you, if there is a reason to merge the unused symbols it needs to be spelled out, otherwise let's drop the last patch for now.I don't think there's any problem with dropping the last patch for now, as that's the safer thing to do (Colin?), but just let us know whether you prefer Colin to resend a 4-patch series, or you can pick this series up without the last one.Repost once it's confirmed that's the right course of action. I'll merge it right away.
I should be able to repost today without the last patch. It is an easy, and resonable one to drag along with the larger ocelot_spi patches I have in progress. And I appreciate all the insight and feedback from everyone. Thanks for helping me keep keep me on track!