Re: [PATCH net-next v8] net: openvswitch: IPv6: Add IPv6 extension header support
From: Cpp Code <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-02 20:20:50
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:34 PM Pravin Shelar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:33 AM Toms Atteka [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This change adds a new OpenFlow field OFPXMT_OFB_IPV6_EXTHDR and packets can be filtered using ipv6_ext flag. Signed-off-by: Toms Atteka <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h | 6 ++ net/openvswitch/flow.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/openvswitch/flow.h | 14 ++++ net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 26 +++++- 4 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h index a87b44cd5590..43790f07e4a2 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ enum ovs_key_attr { OVS_KEY_ATTR_CT_ORIG_TUPLE_IPV4, /* struct ovs_key_ct_tuple_ipv4 */ OVS_KEY_ATTR_CT_ORIG_TUPLE_IPV6, /* struct ovs_key_ct_tuple_ipv6 */ OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH, /* Nested set of ovs_nsh_key_* */ + OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV6_EXTHDRS, /* struct ovs_key_ipv6_exthdr */ #ifdef __KERNEL__ OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUNNEL_INFO, /* struct ip_tunnel_info */@@ -421,6 +422,11 @@ struct ovs_key_ipv6 { __u8 ipv6_frag; /* One of OVS_FRAG_TYPE_*. */ }; +/* separate structure to support backward compatibility with older user space */ +struct ovs_key_ipv6_exthdrs { + __u16 hdrs; +}; + struct ovs_key_tcp { __be16 tcp_src; __be16 tcp_dst;diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c index 9d375e74b607..28acb40437ca 100644 --- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c@@ -239,6 +239,144 @@ static bool icmphdr_ok(struct sk_buff *skb) sizeof(struct icmphdr)); } +/** + * get_ipv6_ext_hdrs() - Parses packet and sets IPv6 extension header flags. + * + * @skb: buffer where extension header data starts in packet + * @nh: ipv6 header + * @ext_hdrs: flags are stored here + * + * OFPIEH12_UNREP is set if more than one of a given IPv6 extension header + * is unexpectedly encountered. (Two destination options headers may be + * expected and would not cause this bit to be set.) + * + * OFPIEH12_UNSEQ is set if IPv6 extension headers were not in the order + * preferred (but not required) by RFC 2460: + * + * When more than one extension header is used in the same packet, it is + * recommended that those headers appear in the following order: + * IPv6 header + * Hop-by-Hop Options header + * Destination Options header + * Routing header + * Fragment header + * Authentication header + * Encapsulating Security Payload header + * Destination Options header + * upper-layer header + */ +static void get_ipv6_ext_hdrs(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ipv6hdr *nh, + u16 *ext_hdrs) +{ + u8 next_type = nh->nexthdr; + unsigned int start = skb_network_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); + int dest_options_header_count = 0; + + *ext_hdrs = 0; + + while (ipv6_ext_hdr(next_type)) { + struct ipv6_opt_hdr _hdr, *hp; + + switch (next_type) { + case IPPROTO_NONE: + *ext_hdrs |= OFPIEH12_NONEXT; + /* stop parsing */ + return; + + case IPPROTO_ESP: + if (*ext_hdrs & OFPIEH12_ESP) + *ext_hdrs |= OFPIEH12_UNREP; + if ((*ext_hdrs & ~(OFPIEH12_HOP | OFPIEH12_DEST | + OFPIEH12_ROUTER | IPPROTO_FRAGMENT | + OFPIEH12_AUTH | OFPIEH12_UNREP)) || + dest_options_header_count >= 2) { + *ext_hdrs |= OFPIEH12_UNSEQ; + } + *ext_hdrs |= OFPIEH12_ESP; + break;you need to check_header() before looking into each extension header.
Could you elaborate why I need to add check_header(), skb_header_pointer() is doing sanitization.