Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-27

Re: [net-next v5 1/2] net: sched: use queue_mapping to pick tx queue

flat view

From: Tonghao Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-30 05:03:40

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 3:14 AM Vinicius Costa Gomes
[off-list ref] wrote:
xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com writes:
quoted
From: Tonghao Zhang <redacted>

This patch fixes issue:
* If we install tc filters with act_skbedit in clsact hook.
  It doesn't work, because netdev_core_pick_tx() overwrites
  queue_mapping.

  $ tc filter ... action skbedit queue_mapping 1

And this patch is useful:
* We can use FQ + EDT to implement efficient policies. Tx queues
  are picked by xps, ndo_select_queue of netdev driver, or skb hash
  in netdev_core_pick_tx(). In fact, the netdev driver, and skb
  hash are _not_ under control. xps uses the CPUs map to select Tx
  queues, but we can't figure out which task_struct of pod/containter
  running on this cpu in most case. We can use clsact filters to classify
  one pod/container traffic to one Tx queue. Why ?

  In containter networking environment, there are two kinds of pod/
  containter/net-namespace. One kind (e.g. P1, P2), the high throughput
  is key in these applications. But avoid running out of network resource,
  the outbound traffic of these pods is limited, using or sharing one
  dedicated Tx queues assigned HTB/TBF/FQ Qdisc. Other kind of pods
  (e.g. Pn), the low latency of data access is key. And the traffic is not
  limited. Pods use or share other dedicated Tx queues assigned FIFO Qdisc.
  This choice provides two benefits. First, contention on the HTB/FQ Qdisc
  lock is significantly reduced since fewer CPUs contend for the same queue.
  More importantly, Qdisc contention can be eliminated completely if each
  CPU has its own FIFO Qdisc for the second kind of pods.

  There must be a mechanism in place to support classifying traffic based on
  pods/container to different Tx queues. Note that clsact is outside of Qdisc
  while Qdisc can run a classifier to select a sub-queue under the
  lock.
One alternative, I don't know if it would work for you, it to use the
net_prio cgroup + mqprio.

Something like this:

* create the cgroup
  $ mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/net_prio/<CGROUP_NAME>
* assign priorities to the cgroup (per interface)
  $ echo "<IFACE> <PRIO>" >> /sys/fs/cgroup/net_prio/<CGROUP_NAME>/net_prio.ifpriomap"
* use the cgroup in applications that do not set SO_PRIORITY
Yes, I think this is key. In k8s, we can not control the priority of
applications in Pod. and I think 2/2 patch
can provide more mechanisms to select queues from a range.
If possible, you can help me review it.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211224164926.80733-3-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com/
  $ cgexec -g net_prio:<CGROUP_NAME> <application>
* configure mqprio
  $ tc qdisc replace dev $IFACE parent root handle 100 mqprio \
      num_tc 3 \
      map 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
      queues 1@0 1@1 2@2 \
      hw 0

This would map all traffic with SO_PRIORITY 3 to TX queue 0, for example.
But I agree that skbedit's queue_mapping not working is unexpected and
should be fixed.


Cheers,
--
Vinicius


-- 
Best regards, Tonghao
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help