Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 01/23] lib: add reference counting tracking infrastructure
flat view
From: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Date: 2021-12-08 15:12:37
On 08.12.2021 15:59, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:09:17 +0100 Andrzej Hajda wrote:quoted
On 05.12.2021 05:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted> It can be hard to track where references are taken and released. In networking, we have annoying issues at device or netns dismantles, and we had various proposals to ease root causing them. This patch adds new infrastructure pairing refcount increases and decreases. This will self document code, because programmers will have to associate increments/decrements. This is controled by CONFIG_REF_TRACKER which can be selected by users of this feature. This adds both cpu and memory costs, and thus should probably be used with care. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>Life is surprising, I was working on my own framework, solving the same issue, with intention to publish it in few days :) My approach was little different: 1. Instead of creating separate framework I have extended debug_objects. 2. There were no additional fields in refcounted object and trackers - infrastructure of debug_objects was reused - debug_objects tracked both pointers of refcounted object and its users. Have you considered using debug_object? it seems to be good place to put it there, I am not sure about performance differences.Something along these lines? https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117174723.2305681-1-kuba@kernel.org/ (local) ;)
Ups, I was not clear in my last sentence, I meant "extend debug_objects with tracking users of the object" :) Regards Andrzej
quoted
One more thing about design - as I understand CONFIG_REF_TRACKER turns on all trackers in whole kernel, have you considered possibility/helpers to enable/disable tracking per class of objects?