Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst | netdev | Ratatoskr

split up filter.rst · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2021-11-15
[PATCH 1/2] bpf, docs: prune all references to "internal BPF" · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2021-11-15
Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, docs: prune all references to "internal BPF" · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2021-11-17
Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, docs: prune all references to "internal BPF" · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2021-11-19
[PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2021-11-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2021-11-18
Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2021-11-19
Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst · Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden> · 2021-11-19

Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, doc: split general purpose eBPF documentation out of filter.rst

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-19 13:03:44
Also in: bpf, linux-doc

Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

In terms of followups and cleanup... please share what you have in mind.

The prime issue I'd like to look in is to replace all the references
to classic BPF and instead make the document standadlone.

Yes, please, this would be awesome! :)

-Toke