Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-01
STALE1681d

[PATCH bpf-next 01/29] ftrace: Use direct_ops hash in unregister_ftrace_direct

From: Jiri Olsa <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-18 11:26:08
Also in: bpf
Subsystem: function hooks (ftrace), the rest, tracing · Maintainers: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu, Linus Torvalds

Now when we have *direct_multi interface the direct_functions
hash is no longer owned just by direct_ops. It's also used by
any other ftrace_ops passed to *direct_multi interface.

Thus to find out that we are unregistering the last function
from direct_ops, we need to check directly direct_ops's hash.

Cc: Steven Rostedt <redacted>
Fixes: f64dd4627ec6 ("ftrace: Add multi direct register/unregister interface")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 30bc880c3849..7f0594e28226 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -5217,6 +5217,7 @@ int unregister_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct ftrace_direct_func *direct;
 	struct ftrace_func_entry *entry;
+	struct ftrace_hash *hash;
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
 
 	mutex_lock(&direct_mutex);
@@ -5225,7 +5226,8 @@ int unregister_ftrace_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
 	if (!entry)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	if (direct_functions->count == 1)
+	hash = direct_ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
+	if (hash->count == 1)
 		unregister_ftrace_function(&direct_ops);
 
 	ret = ftrace_set_filter_ip(&direct_ops, ip, 1, 0);
-- 
2.31.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help