On 08.11.21 09:38, Yafang Shao wrote:
Make sure the string set to task comm is always nul terminated.
strlcpy: "the result is always a valid NUL-terminated string that fits
in the buffer"
The only difference seems to be that strscpy_pad() pads the remainder
with zeroes.
Is this description correct and I am missing something important?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <redacted>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <redacted>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <redacted>
Cc: Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <redacted>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a098c133d8d7..404156b5b314 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
{
task_lock(tsk);
trace_task_rename(tsk, buf);
- strlcpy(tsk->comm, buf, sizeof(tsk->comm));
+ strscpy_pad(tsk->comm, buf, sizeof(tsk->comm));
task_unlock(tsk);
perf_event_comm(tsk, exec);
}
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb