Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 4 authors, 2021-12-10

Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf/kprobe: Add support to create multiple probes

From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-11-29 01:48:30
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:34:13 +0100
Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+		if (!tk_old) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto error;
+		}
+
+		/* Append to existing event */
+		ret = trace_probe_append(&tk->tp, &tk_old->tp);
+		if (ret)
+			goto error;
+
+		/* Register k*probe */
+		ret = __register_trace_kprobe(tk);
+		if (ret)
+			goto error;
If "appended" probe failed to register, it must be "unlinked" from
the first one and goto error to free the trace_kprobe.

	if (ret) {
		trace_probe_unlink(&tk->tp);
		goto error;
	}

See append_trace_kprobe() for details.
so there's goto error jumping to:

error:
	free_trace_kprobe(tk);

that calls:
	trace_probe_cleanup
	  -> trace_probe_unlink

that should do it, right?
Ah, OK. Clean up all the kprobe events in this function. Then it's good. 
quoted
quoted
+
+		return trace_probe_event_call(&tk->tp);
+	}
+
 	init_trace_event_call(tk);
 
 	ptype = trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) ?
@@ -1841,6 +1868,8 @@ create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
 
 void destroy_local_trace_kprobe(struct trace_event_call *event_call)
 {
+	struct trace_probe_event *event;
+	struct trace_probe *pos, *tmp;
 	struct trace_kprobe *tk;
 
 	tk = trace_kprobe_primary_from_call(event_call);
@@ -1852,9 +1881,15 @@ void destroy_local_trace_kprobe(struct trace_event_call *event_call)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__unregister_trace_kprobe(tk);
+	event = tk->tp.event;
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
+		list_del_init(&pos->list);
+		__unregister_trace_kprobe(tk);
+		__free_trace_kprobe(tk);
+	}
 
-	free_trace_kprobe(tk);
+	trace_probe_event_free(event);
Actually, each probe already allocated the trace_probe events (which are not
used if it is appended). Thus you have to use trace_probe_unlink(&tk->tp) in
the above loop.

	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
		list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
		__unregister_trace_kprobe(tk);
		trace_probe_unlink(&tk->tp); /* This will call trace_probe_event_free() internally */
		free_trace_kprobe(tk);
	}
so calling trace_probe_event_free inside this loop is a problem,
because the loop iterates that trace_probe_event's probes list,
and last probe removed will trigger trace_probe_event_free, that
will free the list we iterate..  and we go down ;-)
Oops, right. So in this case, you are looping on the all probes
on an event, so event is referred outside of loop.

OK, I got it.

In the ftrace kprobe-event, this loop cursor is done by dynevent,
so this problem doesn't occur. But the BPF is only using the
trace_event, thus this special routine is needed.

Could you add such comment on your loop?

Thank you,
so that's why I added new free function '__free_trace_kprobe'
that frees everything as free_trace_kprobe, but does not call
trace_probe_unlink

	event = tk->tp.event;
	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
		list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, &event->probes, list) {
		list_del_init(&pos->list);
		__unregister_trace_kprobe(tk);
		__free_trace_kprobe(tk);
	}

	trace_probe_event_free(event);

and there's trace_probe_event_free(event) to make the final free

thanks,
jirka

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help