On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:36:58AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
Hi Russell,
On 11/18/21 8:31 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
quoted
The 11/18/2021 09:59, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
Another approach would be to split phylink_mii_c22_pcs_decode_state()
so that the appropriate decode function is selected depending on the
interface state, which may be a better idea.
I have tried to look for phylink_mii_c22_pcs_decode_state() and I
have found it only here [1], and seems that it depends on [2]. But not
much activity happened to these series since October.
Do you think they will still get in?
I don't see any reason the first two patches should not be sent. I'm
carrying the second one locally because I use it in some changes I've
made to the mv88e6xxx code - as I mentioned in the patchwork entry you
linked to. See:
http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/log/?h=net-queue
"net: phylink: Add helpers for c22 registers without MDIO"
Although I notice I committed it to my tree with the wrong author. :(
Sean, please can you submit the mdiodev patch and this patch for
net-next as they have general utility? Thanks.
The mdiodev patch is already in the tree as 0ebecb2644c8 ("net: mdio:
Add helper functions for accessing MDIO devices"). The c22 patch is
submitted as [1].
--Sean
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211022160959.3350916-1-sean.anderson@seco.com/ (local)
Patchwork says its deferrred:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211022160959.3350916-1-sean.anderson@seco.com/
However, it does apply to current net-next, but Jakub did ask for
it to be resubmitted. Given that patches are being quickly applied
to net-next, I suggest resubmission may be just what's neeeded!
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!