Re: [PATCH net v3] net: marvell: prestera: fix hw structure laid out
From: Volodymyr Mytnyk [C] <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-05 16:33:39
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 2:09 PM Volodymyr Mytnyk [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Volodymyr Mytnyk <redacted> The prestera FW v4.0 support commit has been merged accidentally w/o review comments addressed and waiting for the final patch set to be uploaded. So, fix the remaining comments related to structure laid out and build issues. Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted> Fixes: bb5dbf2cc64d ("net: marvell: prestera: add firmware v4.0 support") Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <redacted>I saw this warning today on net-next: drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_hw.c:285:1: error: alignment 1 of 'union prestera_msg_port_param' is less than 4 [-Werror=packed-not-aligned] and this is addressed by your patch.
yes, I don't see any errors on the patchwork anymore.
However, there is still this structure that lacks explicit padding:
struct prestera_msg_acl_match {
__le32 type;
/* there is a four-byte hole on most architectures, but not on
x86-32 or m68k */Checked holes on x86_64 with pahole, and there is no holes. Maybe on some other there will be. Will add 4byte member here to make sure. Thx.
union {
struct {
u8 key;
u8 mask;
} __packed u8;
/* The __packed here makes no sense since this one is aligned but theright, will remove it.
other ones are not */
struct {
__le16 key;
__le16 mask;
} u16;
struct {
__le32 key;
__le32 mask;
} u32;
struct {
__le64 key;
__le64 mask;
} u64;
struct {
u8 key[ETH_ALEN];
u8 mask[ETH_ALEN];
} mac;
} keymask;
};
and a minor issue in
struct prestera_msg_event_port_param {
union {
struct {
__le32 mode;
__le32 speed;
u8 oper;
u8 duplex;
u8 fc;
u8 fec;
} mac;
struct {
__le64 lmode_bmap;
u8 mdix;
u8 fc;
u8 __pad[2];
} __packed phy;
} __packed;
} __packed;
There is no need to make the outer aggregates __packed, I would
mark only the innermost ones here: mode, speed and lmode_bmap.
Same for prestera_msg_port_cap_param and prestera_msg_port_param.Will add __packed only to innermost ones. Looks like only phy is required to have __packed.
It would be best to add some comments next to the __packed attributes to explain exactly which members are misaligned and why. I see that most of the packed structures are included in union prestera_msg_port_param, which makes that packed as well, however nothing that uses this union puts it on a misaligned address, so I don't see what the purpose is.
Will try to get rid of the __packed attributes from prestera_msg_port_param by aligning the members in nested union of that struct. Thx.
Arnd