Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, 2021-11-09

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Add selftests

From: Hou Tao <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-04 06:32:48
Also in: bpf, lkml

Hi,

On 11/2/2021 10:14 AM, Joe Burton wrote:
From: Joe Burton <redacted>

Add selftests verifying that each supported map type is traced.

Signed-off-by: Joe Burton <redacted>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_trace.c      | 166 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace.c       |  95 ++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace_common.h          |  12 ++
 3 files changed, 273 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_trace.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_map_trace_common.h
snip
+	/*
+	 * Invoke core BPF program.
+	 */
+	write_fd = open("/tmp/map_trace_test_file", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(rc, 0, "open tmp file for writing"))
+		goto out;
+
+	bytes_written = write(write_fd, &write_buf, sizeof(write_buf));
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(bytes_written, sizeof(write_buf), "write to tmp file"))
+		return;
In fentry__x64_sys_write(), you just do trigger updates to maps, so for the
portability of the test
(e.g. run-able for arm64) and minimal dependency (e.g. don't depends on /tmp),
why do you
using nanosleep() and replacing fentry_x64_sys_write by
tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep instead.
Also it will be better if you can filter out other processes by pid.

Thanks,
Tao
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help