Re: [PATCH net-next] veth: use ethtool_sprintf instead of snprintf

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:54:38 +0800 xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote:

 		for (i = 0; i < dev->real_num_rx_queues; i++) {
-			for (j = 0; j < VETH_RQ_STATS_LEN; j++) {
-				snprintf(p, ETH_GSTRING_LEN,
-					 "rx_queue_%u_%.18s",
-					 i, veth_rq_stats_desc[j].desc);
-				p += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
-			}
+			for (j = 0; j < VETH_RQ_STATS_LEN; j++)
+				ethtool_sprintf(&p, "rx_queue_%u_%.18s",
+						i, veth_rq_stats_desc[j].desc);
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < dev->real_num_tx_queues; i++) {
-			for (j = 0; j < VETH_TQ_STATS_LEN; j++) {
-				snprintf(p, ETH_GSTRING_LEN,
-					 "tx_queue_%u_%.18s",
-					 i, veth_tq_stats_desc[j].desc);
-				p += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
-			}
+			for (j = 0; j < VETH_TQ_STATS_LEN; j++)
+				ethtool_sprintf(&p, "tx_queue_%u_%.18s",
+						i, veth_tq_stats_desc[j].desc);
 		}

You can drop the brackets from the outside for as well.