Re: [RFC 07/12] ravb: Fillup ravb_rx_gbeth() stub
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-09 08:34:52
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
On 09.10.2021 11:27, Biju Das wrote:
quoted
quoted
[...]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Fillup ravb_rx_gbeth() function to support RZ/G2L. This patch also renames ravb_rcar_rx to ravb_rx_rcar to be consistent with the naming convention used in sh_eth driver. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar [off-list ref][...]diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index 37164a983156..42573eac82b9 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -720,6 +720,23 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(structnet_device*ndev)quoted
} } +static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb) { + u8 *hw_csum; + + /* The hardware checksum is contained in sizeof(__sum16) (2)bytesquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ * appended to packet data + */ + if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16))) + return; + hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - sizeof(__sum16);[...]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Please check the section 30.5.6.1 checksum calculation handling> And figure 30.25 the field of checksum attaching fieldI have.quoted
Also see Table 30.17 for checksum values for non-error conditions.quoted
TCP/UDP/ICPM checksum is at last 2bytes.What are you arguing with then? :-) My point was that your code fetched the TCP/UDP/ICMP checksum ISO the IP checksum because it subtracts sizeof(__sum16), while should probably subtract sizeof(__wsum)Agreed. My code missed IP4 checksum result. May be we need to extract 2 checksum info from last 4 bytes. First checksum(2bytes) is IP4 header checksum and next checksum(2 bytes) for TCP/UDP/ICMP and use this info finding the non error case mentioned in Table30.17.quoted
quoted
quoted
For eg:- IPV6 non error-condition --> "0xFFFF"-->IPV4HeaderCSum value and"0x0000"quoted
quoted
quoted
TCP/UDP/ICMP CSUM value IPV4 non error-condition --> "0x0000"-->IPV4HeaderCSum value and"0x0000"quoted
quoted
quoted
TCP/UDP/ICMP CSUM value Do you agree?quoted
What I meant here is some thing like below, please let me know if you have any issues with this, otherwise I would like to send the patchwith below changes.quoted
quoted
Further improvements can happen later. Please let me know. +/* Hardware checksum status */ +#define IPV4_RX_CSUM_OK 0x00000000 +#define IPV6_RX_CSUM_OK 0xFFFF0000Mhm, this should prolly come from the IP headers... [...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index bbb42e5328e4..d9201fbbd472 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -722,16 +722,18 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(structnet_device *ndev) static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb) { - u16 *hw_csum; + u32 csum_result;This is not against the patch currently under investigation. :-)quoted
+ u8 *hw_csum; /* The hardware checksum is contained in sizeof(__sum16) (2)bytesquoted
quoted
* appended to packet data */ - if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16))) + if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__wsum)))I think this usage of __wsum is valid (I remember that I suggestedit). We have 2 16-bit checksums here I meant "I don't think", of course. :-)Ok will use 2 * sizeof(__sum16) instead and extract IPV4 header csum and TCP/UDP/ICMP csum result.
I'm not sure how to deal with the later...
All error condition/unsupported cases will be passed to stack with CHECKSUM_NONE and only non-error cases will be set as CHECKSUM_UNNCESSARY. Does it sounds good to you?
No. The networking stack needs to know about the bad checksums too.
Regards, Biju
quoted
[...]
MBR, Sergey