Re: [PATCH V2 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: use 32bit safe version of u64_stats

[PATCH V2 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: use 32bit safe version of u64_stats · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2021-10-26
[PATCH V2 bpf-next 1/3] bpf: avoid races in __bpf_prog_run() for 32bit arches · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2021-10-26
[PATCH V2 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: fixes possible race in update_prog_stats() for 32bit arches · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2021-10-26
[PATCH V2 bpf-next 3/3] bpf: use u64_stats_t in struct bpf_prog_stats · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2021-10-26
Re: [PATCH V2 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: use 32bit safe version of u64_stats · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2021-10-27

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-27 18:17:59
Also in: bpf

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:41 PM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Two first patches fix bugs added in 5.1 and 5.5

Third patch replaces the u64 fields in struct bpf_prog_stats
with u64_stats_t ones to avoid possible sampling errors,
in case of load/store stearing.

Applied to bpf-next. Thanks!

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help