[PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: ethtool -L fixes · Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> · 2021-10-26
[PATCH intel-next 1/2] ice: fix vsi->txq_map sizing · Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> · 2021-10-26
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 1/2] ice: fix vsi->txq_map sizing · Bhandare, KiranX <hidden> · 2021-11-18
[PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: avoid bpf_prog refcount underflow · Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> · 2021-10-26
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: avoid bpf_prog refcount underflow · Bhandare, KiranX <hidden> · 2021-11-18
Wrong date/time of messages (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: ethtool -L fixes) · Paul Menzel <hidden> · 2021-10-26

Wrong date/time of messages (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: ethtool -L fixes)

From: Paul Menzel <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-26 15:30:31
Also in: bpf, intel-wired-lan

Dear Intel folks,


On 26.10.21 18:47, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:

[…]

Once again messages were sent to the list with a Date from the future. Why can’t Intel employees work on systems with a correct clock?

It’d would be great if somebody from Intel would at least have the courtesy to analyze and fix the root cause.


Kind regards,

Paul

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help