RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-12 05:27:12
Also in:
bpf
[...]
quoted
quoted
Thanks. Please add Fixes tags so we can track these I've added it here. This has been broken from the initial patches and after a quick glance I suspect this will need manual backports if we need it. Also all the I use and all the selftests set parser to a nop by returning skb->len. Can you also create a test so we can ensure we don't break this again?Okay, I will do this after the holiday.Hi John, I checked selftests, there are have one test case named " test_txmsg_ingress_parser". But with this patch and ktls, the test failed, this because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value is 285 not 256. the case like this: tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2 tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk recved 570 btyes data, and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred. I fix this as below:
Ah good catch.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c@@ -1680,6 +1680,8 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) { txmsg_pass = 1; skb_use_parser = 512; + if (ktls == 1) + skb_use_parser = 570; opt->iov_length = 256; opt->iov_count = 1; opt->rate = 2;And i add one new test as below, is it ok?
Yes looks good to me.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct sockmap_options { bool sendpage; bool data_test; bool drop_expected; + bool check_recved_len; int iov_count; int iov_length; int rate;@@ -556,8 +557,12 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt, int err, i, flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL; bool drop = opt->drop_expected; bool data = opt->data_test; + int iov_alloc_length = iov_length; - err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_length, data, tx); + if (!tx && opt->check_recved_len) + iov_alloc_length *= 2; + + err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_alloc_length, data, tx); if (err) goto out_errno; if (peek_flag) {@@ -665,6 +670,13 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt, s->bytes_recvd += recv; + if (opt->check_recved_len && s->bytes_recvd > total_bytes) { + errno = EMSGSIZE; + fprintf(stderr, "recv failed(), bytes_recvd:%zd, total_bytes:%f\n", + s->bytes_recvd, total_bytes); + goto out_errno; + } + if (data) { int chunk_sz = opt->sendpage ? iov_length * cnt :@@ -744,7 +756,8 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt) rxpid = fork(); if (rxpid == 0) { - iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1); + if (txmsg_pop || txmsg_start_pop) + iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1); if (opt->drop_expected || txmsg_ktls_skb_drop) _exit(0);@@ -1688,6 +1701,19 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) test_exec(cgrp, opt); } +static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser2(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) +{ + if (ktls == 1) + return; + skb_use_parser = 10; + opt->iov_length = 20; + opt->iov_count = 1; + opt->rate = 1; + opt->check_recved_len = true; + test_exec(cgrp, opt); + opt->check_recved_len = false; +} + char *map_names[] = { "sock_map", "sock_map_txmsg",@@ -1786,7 +1812,8 @@ struct _test test[] = { {"txmsg test pull-data", test_txmsg_pull}, {"txmsg test pop-data", test_txmsg_pop}, {"txmsg test push/pop data", test_txmsg_push_pop}, - {"txmsg text ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser}, + {"txmsg test ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser}, + {"txmsg test ingress parser2", test_txmsg_ingress_parser2}, };
Great, please post as a series.