Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] New RGMII delay DT bindings for the SJA1105 DSA driver
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-10-20 11:10:31
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by David S. Miller [off-list ref]: On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:29:48 +0300 you wrote:
During recent reviews I've been telling people that new MAC drivers should adopt a certain DT binding format for RGMII delays in order to avoid conflicting interpretations. Some suggestions were better received than others, and it appears we are still far from a consensus. Part of the problem seems to be that there are still drivers that apply RGMII delays based on an incorrect interpretation of the device tree, and these serve as a bad example for others. I happen to maintain one of those drivers and I am able to test it, so I figure that one of the ways in which I can make a change is to stop providing a bad example. [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: fix example so all ports have a phy-handle of fixed-link
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7a414b6e1a1c
- [net-next,2/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: inherit the ethernet-controller DT schema
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e00eb643324c
- [net-next,3/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: sja1105: add {rx,tx}-internal-delay-ps
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ac41ac81e331
- [net-next,4/4] net: dsa: sja1105: parse {rx, tx}-internal-delay-ps properties for RGMII delays
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9ca482a246f0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html