On 17.10.2021 20:52:14, Dongliang Mu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 8:36 PM Marc Kleine-Budde [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 13.10.2021 13:21:09, Dongliang Mu wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:04 PM Dongliang Mu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If register_candev fails, xcan_probe does not clean the napi
created by netif_napi_add.
It seems the netif_napi_del operation is done in the free_candev
(free_netdev precisely).
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dev->napi_list, dev_list)
netif_napi_del(p);
And list_add_rcu(&napi->dev_list, &dev->napi_list) is done in the
netif_napi_add.
Therefore, I suggest removing "netif_napi_del" operation in the
xcan_remove to match probe and remove function.
Sounds reasonable, can you create a patch for this.
I have submitted one patch - https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/17/181
Thanks for the patch.
Regards,
Marc
BTW: Do you know the new kernel.org mailing list archive available at
https://lore.kernel.org ?
You can reference a mail using its Message-ID, in you case it's:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211017125022.3100329-1-mudongliangabcd@gmail.com (local)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |