Re: [net PATCH v2 01/15] drivers: net: phy: at803x: fix resume for QCA8327 phy
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-08 08:45:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 07:23:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 02:22:11 +0200 Ansuel Smith wrote:quoted
From Documentation phy resume triggers phy reset and restart auto-negotiation. Add a dedicated function to wait reset to finish as it was notice a regression where port sometime are not reliable after a suspend/resume session. The reset wait logic is copied from phy_poll_reset. Add dedicated suspend function to use genphy_suspend only with QCA8337 phy and set only additional debug settings for QCA8327. With more test it was reported that QCA8327 doesn't proprely support this mode and using this cause the unreliability of the switch ports, especially the malfunction of the port0. Fixes: 52a6cdbe43a3 ("net: phy: at803x: add resume/suspend function to qca83xx phy")Strange, checkpatch catches the wrong hash being used, but the verify_fixes script doesn't. Did you mean: Fixes: 15b9df4ece17 ("net: phy: at803x: add resume/suspend function to qca83xx phy") Or is 52a6cdbe43a3 the correct commit hash? Same question for patch 2. The fixes have to be a _separate_ series.
Hi, this series contains changes that depends on the fixes. (the 4th patch that rename the define is based on this 2 patch) How to handle that? I know it was wrong to put net and net-next patch in the same series but I don't know how to handle this strange situation. Any hint about that? About the wrong hash, yes I wrongly took the hash from my local branch. -- Ansuel