Re: [PATCH net v9] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-04 19:26:09
Also in:
lkml
On 10/4/21 6:00 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit. This may happen because of two reasons: - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early, before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case. - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case. In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082 Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()") Fixes: 2d85a1b31dde ("ipv6: ip6_finish_output2: set sk into newly allocated nskb") Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <redacted> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <redacted> --- v9: restored sock_edemux check v8: clone non-wmem skb v7 (from kuba@): shift more magic into helpers, follow Eric's advice and don't inherit non-wmem skbs for now v6: fixed delta, improved comments v5: fixed else condition, thanks to Eric reworked update of expanded skb, added corresponding comments v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(), added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors there are 2 ways to use it: - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended skb. v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet, added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc. --- include/net/sock.h | 1 + net/core/skbuff.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 66a9a90f9558..a547651d46a7 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h@@ -1695,6 +1695,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force, gfp_t priority); void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb); struct sk_buff *sock_omalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, gfp_t priority); void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb);diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index 2170bea2c7de..8cb6d360cda5 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c@@ -1804,30 +1804,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_realloc_headroom); struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom) { int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb); + int osize = skb_end_offset(skb); + struct sock *sk = skb->sk; if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0, "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__)) return skb; - /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */ - if (skb_shared(skb)) { + delta = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta); + /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared. */ + if (skb_shared(skb) || !is_skb_wmem(skb)) { struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (likely(nskb)) { - if (skb->sk) - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk); - consume_skb(skb); - } else { - kfree_skb(skb); - } + if (unlikely(!nskb)) + goto fail; + + if (sk) + skb_set_owner_w(nskb, sk); + consume_skb(skb); skb = nskb; } - if (skb && - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) { - kfree_skb(skb); - skb = NULL; + if (pskb_expand_head(skb, delta, 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) + goto fail; + + if (sk && skb->destructor != sock_edemux) {
Why not re-using is_skb_wmem() here ?
Testing != sock_edemux looks strange.quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ delta = skb_end_offset(skb) - osize; + refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); + skb->truesize += delta; } return skb; + +fail: + kfree_skb(skb); + return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_expand_head);diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 62627e868e03..1932755ae9ba 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c@@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w); +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + return skb->destructor == sock_wfree || + skb->destructor == __sock_wfree || + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem); +
This probably should be inlined.
static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE