From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
A following patch is going to implement a similar reclaim schema
for the MPTCP protocol, with different locking.
Let's define a couple of macros for the used thresholds, so
that the latter code will be more easily maintainable.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <redacted>
---
include/net/sock.h | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index ff4e62aa62e5..df0e0efb1882 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1573,6 +1573,11 @@ static inline void sk_mem_charge(struct sock *sk, int size)
sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
}
+/* the following macros control memory reclaiming in sk_mem_uncharge()
+ */
+#define SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD (1 << 21)
+#define SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK (1 << 20)
+
static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
{
int reclaimable;@@ -1589,8 +1594,8 @@ static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
* If we reach 2 MBytes, reclaim 1 MBytes right now, there is
* no need to hold that much forward allocation anyway.
*/
- if (unlikely(reclaimable >= 1 << 21))
- __sk_mem_reclaim(sk, 1 << 20);
+ if (unlikely(reclaimable >= SK_RECLAIM_THRESHOLD))
+ __sk_mem_reclaim(sk, SK_RECLAIM_CHUNK);
}
static inline void sk_wmem_free_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
--
2.33.1