[PATCH net-next 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: skip confirmation and nat hooks in postrouting for vrf
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2021-10-21 14:49:14
Also in:
netfilter-devel
Subsystem:
netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
The VRF driver invokes netfilter for output+postrouting hooks so that users can create rules that check for 'oif $vrf' rather than lower device name. Afterwards, ip stack calls those hooks again. This is a problem when conntrack is used with IP masquerading. masquerading has an internal check that re-validates the output interface to account for route changes. This check will trigger in the vrf case. If the -j MASQUERADE rule matched on the first iteration, then round 2 finds state->out->ifindex != nat->masq_index: the latter is the vrf index, but out->ifindex is the lower device. The packet gets dropped and the conntrack entry is invalidated. This change makes conntrack postrouting skip the nat hooks. Also skip confirmation. This allows the second round (postrouting invocation from ipv4/ipv6) to create nat bindings. This also prevents the second round from seeing packets that had their source address changed by the nat hook. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> --- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 12 +++++++++++- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
index 8f7a9837349c..d1f2d3c8d2b1 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c@@ -155,6 +155,16 @@ unsigned int nf_confirm(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_confirm); +static bool in_vrf_postrouting(const struct nf_hook_state *state) +{ +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV) + if (state->hook == NF_INET_POST_ROUTING && + netif_is_l3_master(state->out)) + return true; +#endif + return false; +} + static unsigned int ipv4_confirm(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)
@@ -166,6 +176,9 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_confirm(void *priv, if (!ct || ctinfo == IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY) return nf_conntrack_confirm(skb); + if (in_vrf_postrouting(state)) + return NF_ACCEPT; + return nf_confirm(skb, skb_network_offset(skb) + ip_hdrlen(skb), ct, ctinfo);
@@ -374,6 +387,9 @@ static unsigned int ipv6_confirm(void *priv, if (!ct || ctinfo == IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY) return nf_conntrack_confirm(skb); + if (in_vrf_postrouting(state)) + return NF_ACCEPT; + protoff = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), &pnum, &frag_off); if (protoff < 0 || (frag_off & htons(~0x7)) != 0) {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index 273117683922..4d50d51db796 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c@@ -699,6 +699,16 @@ unsigned int nf_nat_packet(struct nf_conn *ct, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_nat_packet); +static bool in_vrf_postrouting(const struct nf_hook_state *state) +{ +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV) + if (state->hook == NF_INET_POST_ROUTING && + netif_is_l3_master(state->out)) + return true; +#endif + return false; +} + unsigned int nf_nat_inet_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)
@@ -715,7 +725,7 @@ nf_nat_inet_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, * packet filter it out, or implement conntrack/NAT for that * protocol. 8) --RR */ - if (!ct) + if (!ct || in_vrf_postrouting(state)) return NF_ACCEPT; nat = nfct_nat(ct);
--
2.32.0