Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: qed_ptp: fix redundant check of rc and against -EINVAL
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-10-20 08:48:40
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:26:41AM -0600, Jεan Sacren wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Jean Sacren <redacted> We should first check rc alone and then check it against -EINVAL to avoid repeating the same operation. With this change, we could also use constant 0 for return. Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ptp.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ptp.c index 2c62d732e5c2..c927ff409109 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ptp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ptp.c@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ static int qed_ptp_res_lock(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, struct qed_ptt *p_ptt) qed_mcp_resc_lock_default_init(¶ms, NULL, resource, true); rc = qed_mcp_resc_lock(p_hwfn, p_ptt, ¶ms); - if (rc && rc != -EINVAL) { - return rc; - } else if (rc == -EINVAL) { + if (rc) { + if (rc != -EINVAL) + return rc; /* MFW doesn't support resource locking, first PF on the port * has lock ownership. */@@ -63,12 +63,14 @@ static int qed_ptp_res_lock(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, struct qed_ptt *p_ptt) DP_INFO(p_hwfn, "PF doesn't have lock ownership\n"); return -EBUSY; - } else if (!rc && !params.b_granted) { + } + + if (!params.b_granted) {
Can it be the case where the condition above is met and !rc is false? If so your patch seems to have changed the logic of this function.
DP_INFO(p_hwfn, "Failed to acquire ptp resource lock\n"); return -EBUSY; } - return rc; + return 0; } static int qed_ptp_res_unlock(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, struct qed_ptt *p_ptt)