[PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

Subsystems: bpf [l7 framework] (sockmap), networking [general], the rest

STALE1787d

6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-10-12 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: Liu Jian <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-29 02:06:35

If sockmap enable strparser, there are lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress. If the length determined by parse_msg function
is not skb->len, the skb will be converted to sk_msg multiple times,
and userspace app will get the data multiple times.

Fix this by get the offset and length from strp_msg.
And as Cong suggestion, add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish
enable or disable strparser.

Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted>
---
v1->v2: fix build error when disable CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER
v2->v3: Add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish enable or disable strparser
v3->v4: Remove "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)" code;
	and let "stm" have a more precise scope.

 include/linux/skmsg.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 net/core/skmsg.c      | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index 14ab0c0bc924..94e2a1f6e58d 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -508,8 +508,22 @@ static inline bool sk_psock_strp_enabled(struct sk_psock *psock)
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_SOCK_MSG)
 
-/* We only have one bit so far. */
-#define BPF_F_PTR_MASK ~(BPF_F_INGRESS)
+#define BPF_F_STRPARSER	(1UL << 1)
+
+/* We only have two bits so far. */
+#define BPF_F_PTR_MASK ~(BPF_F_INGRESS | BPF_F_STRPARSER)
+
+static inline bool skb_bpf_strparser(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	unsigned long sk_redir = skb->_sk_redir;
+
+	return sk_redir & BPF_F_STRPARSER;
+}
+
+static inline void skb_bpf_set_strparser(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	skb->_sk_redir |= BPF_F_STRPARSER;
+}
 
 static inline bool skb_bpf_ingress(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 2d6249b28928..e85b7f8491b9 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ static struct sk_msg *sk_psock_create_ingress_msg(struct sock *sk,
 }
 
 static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb,
+					u32 off, u32 len,
 					struct sk_psock *psock,
 					struct sock *sk,
 					struct sk_msg *msg)
@@ -507,11 +508,11 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	 */
 	if (skb_linearize(skb))
 		return -EAGAIN;
-	num_sge = skb_to_sgvec(skb, msg->sg.data, 0, skb->len);
+	num_sge = skb_to_sgvec(skb, msg->sg.data, off, len);
 	if (unlikely(num_sge < 0))
 		return num_sge;
 
-	copied = skb->len;
+	copied = len;
 	msg->sg.start = 0;
 	msg->sg.size = copied;
 	msg->sg.end = num_sge;
@@ -522,9 +523,11 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return copied;
 }
 
-static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb);
+static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     u32 off, u32 len);
 
-static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				u32 off, u32 len)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
 	struct sk_msg *msg;
@@ -535,7 +538,7 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * correctly.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(skb->sk == sk))
-		return sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb);
+		return sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb, off, len);
 	msg = sk_psock_create_ingress_msg(sk, skb);
 	if (!msg)
 		return -EAGAIN;
@@ -547,7 +550,7 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * into user buffers.
 	 */
 	skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
-	err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(skb, psock, sk, msg);
+	err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(skb, off, len, psock, sk, msg);
 	if (err < 0)
 		kfree(msg);
 	return err;
@@ -557,7 +560,8 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
  * skb. In this case we do not need to check memory limits or skb_set_owner_r
  * because the skb is already accounted for here.
  */
-static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     u32 off, u32 len)
 {
 	struct sk_msg *msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg), __GFP_NOWARN | GFP_ATOMIC);
 	struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
@@ -567,7 +571,7 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	sk_msg_init(msg);
 	skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
-	err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(skb, psock, sk, msg);
+	err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue(skb, off, len, psock, sk, msg);
 	if (err < 0)
 		kfree(msg);
 	return err;
@@ -581,7 +585,7 @@ static int sk_psock_handle_skb(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			return -EAGAIN;
 		return skb_send_sock(psock->sk, skb, off, len);
 	}
-	return sk_psock_skb_ingress(psock, skb);
+	return sk_psock_skb_ingress(psock, skb, off, len);
 }
 
 static void sk_psock_skb_state(struct sk_psock *psock,
@@ -624,6 +628,12 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
 	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&psock->ingress_skb))) {
 		len = skb->len;
 		off = 0;
+		if (skb_bpf_strparser(skb)) {
+			struct strp_msg *stm = strp_msg(skb);
+
+			off = stm->offset;
+			len = stm->full_len;
+		}
 start:
 		ingress = skb_bpf_ingress(skb);
 		skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
@@ -930,6 +940,7 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	struct sock *sk_other;
 	int err = 0;
+	u32 len, off;
 
 	switch (verdict) {
 	case __SK_PASS:
@@ -949,7 +960,15 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		 * retrying later from workqueue.
 		 */
 		if (skb_queue_empty(&psock->ingress_skb)) {
-			err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb);
+			len = skb->len;
+			off = 0;
+			if (skb_bpf_strparser(skb)) {
+				struct strp_msg *stm = strp_msg(skb);
+
+				off = stm->offset;
+				len = stm->full_len;
+			}
+			err = sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(psock, skb, off, len);
 		}
 		if (err < 0) {
 			spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
@@ -1018,6 +1037,7 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_read(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
 		skb->sk = NULL;
 	}
+	skb_bpf_set_strparser(skb);
 	sk_psock_verdict_apply(psock, skb, ret);
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: Cong Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-29 05:19:29

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Liu Jian [off-list ref] wrote:
If sockmap enable strparser, there are lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress. If the length determined by parse_msg function
is not skb->len, the skb will be converted to sk_msg multiple times,
and userspace app will get the data multiple times.

Fix this by get the offset and length from strp_msg.
And as Cong suggestion, add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish
enable or disable strparser.

Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted>
---
v1->v2: fix build error when disable CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER
v2->v3: Add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish enable or disable strparser
v3->v4: Remove "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)" code;
        and let "stm" have a more precise scope.
Looks much cleaner now.

Reviewed-by: Cong Wang <redacted>

Thanks.

RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-09-30 22:48:38

Liu Jian wrote:
If sockmap enable strparser, there are lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress. If the length determined by parse_msg function
is not skb->len, the skb will be converted to sk_msg multiple times,
and userspace app will get the data multiple times.

Fix this by get the offset and length from strp_msg.
And as Cong suggestion, add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish
enable or disable strparser.

Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted>
---
Thanks. Please add Fixes tags so we can track these I've added it here.

This has been broken from the initial patches and after a quick glance I
suspect this will need manual backports if we need it. Also all the
I use and all the selftests set parser to a nop by returning skb->len.

Can you also create a test so we can ensure we don't break this
again?

Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: liujian (CE) <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-04 04:27:39

-----Original Message-----
From: John Fastabend [mailto:john.fastabend@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 6:48 AM
To: liujian (CE) <redacted>; john.fastabend@gmail.com;
daniel@iogearbox.net; jakub@cloudflare.com; lmb@cloudflare.com;
davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; ast@kernel.org;
andrii@kernel.org; kafai@fb.com; songliubraving@fb.com; yhs@fb.com;
kpsingh@kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Cc: liujian (CE) <redacted>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

Liu Jian wrote:
quoted
If sockmap enable strparser, there are lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress. If the length determined by parse_msg function
is not skb->len, the skb will be converted to sk_msg multiple times,
and userspace app will get the data multiple times.

Fix this by get the offset and length from strp_msg.
And as Cong suggestion, add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish
enable or disable strparser.

Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted>
---
Thanks. Please add Fixes tags so we can track these I've added it here.

This has been broken from the initial patches and after a quick glance I
suspect this will need manual backports if we need it. Also all the I use and all
the selftests set parser to a nop by returning skb->len.

Can you also create a test so we can ensure we don't break this again?
Okay, I will do this after the holiday.
Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Thank you for reviewing this patch again.

RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: liujian (CE) <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-12 02:36:23

-----Original Message-----
From: liujian (CE)
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 12:28 PM
To: 'John Fastabend' <john.fastabend@gmail.com>; daniel@iogearbox.net;
jakub@cloudflare.com; lmb@cloudflare.com; davem@davemloft.net;
kuba@kernel.org; ast@kernel.org; andrii@kernel.org; kafai@fb.com;
songliubraving@fb.com; yhs@fb.com; kpsingh@kernel.org;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org; xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress


quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: John Fastabend [mailto:john.fastabend@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 6:48 AM
To: liujian (CE) <redacted>; john.fastabend@gmail.com;
daniel@iogearbox.net; jakub@cloudflare.com; lmb@cloudflare.com;
davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; ast@kernel.org;
andrii@kernel.org; kafai@fb.com; songliubraving@fb.com; yhs@fb.com;
kpsingh@kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org;
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Cc: liujian (CE) <redacted>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress

Liu Jian wrote:
quoted
If sockmap enable strparser, there are lose offset info in
sk_psock_skb_ingress. If the length determined by parse_msg function
is not skb->len, the skb will be converted to sk_msg multiple times,
and userspace app will get the data multiple times.

Fix this by get the offset and length from strp_msg.
And as Cong suggestion, add one bit in skb->_sk_redir to distinguish
enable or disable strparser.

Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <redacted>
---
Thanks. Please add Fixes tags so we can track these I've added it here.

This has been broken from the initial patches and after a quick glance
I suspect this will need manual backports if we need it. Also all the
I use and all the selftests set parser to a nop by returning skb->len.

Can you also create a test so we can ensure we don't break this again?
Okay, I will do this after the holiday.

Hi John, 
I checked selftests, there are have one test case named " test_txmsg_ingress_parser".
But with this patch and ktls, the test failed, this because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value is 285 not 256.
the case like this: 
tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2
tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk recved 570 btyes data,
and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred.
I fix this as below:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -1680,6 +1680,8 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 {
        txmsg_pass = 1;
        skb_use_parser = 512;
+       if (ktls == 1)
+               skb_use_parser = 570;
        opt->iov_length = 256;
        opt->iov_count = 1;
        opt->rate = 2;

And i add one new test as below, is it ok?
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct sockmap_options {
        bool sendpage;
        bool data_test;
        bool drop_expected;
+       bool check_recved_len;
        int iov_count;
        int iov_length;
        int rate;
@@ -556,8 +557,12 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
        int err, i, flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL;
        bool drop = opt->drop_expected;
        bool data = opt->data_test;
+       int iov_alloc_length = iov_length;
 
-       err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_length, data, tx);
+       if (!tx && opt->check_recved_len)
+               iov_alloc_length *= 2;
+
+       err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_alloc_length, data, tx);
        if (err)
                goto out_errno;
        if (peek_flag) {
@@ -665,6 +670,13 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 
                        s->bytes_recvd += recv;
 
+                       if (opt->check_recved_len && s->bytes_recvd > total_bytes) {
+                               errno = EMSGSIZE;
+                               fprintf(stderr, "recv failed(), bytes_recvd:%zd, total_bytes:%f\n",
+                                               s->bytes_recvd, total_bytes);
+                               goto out_errno;
+                       }
+
                        if (data) {
                                int chunk_sz = opt->sendpage ?
                                                iov_length * cnt :
@@ -744,7 +756,8 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt)
 
        rxpid = fork();
        if (rxpid == 0) {
-               iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1);
+               if (txmsg_pop || txmsg_start_pop)
+                       iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1);
                if (opt->drop_expected || txmsg_ktls_skb_drop)
                        _exit(0);
 
@@ -1688,6 +1701,19 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
        test_exec(cgrp, opt);
 }
 
+static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser2(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
+{
+       if (ktls == 1)
+               return;
+       skb_use_parser = 10;
+       opt->iov_length = 20;
+       opt->iov_count = 1;
+       opt->rate = 1;
+       opt->check_recved_len = true;
+       test_exec(cgrp, opt);
+       opt->check_recved_len = false;
+}
+
 char *map_names[] = {
        "sock_map",
        "sock_map_txmsg",
@@ -1786,7 +1812,8 @@ struct _test test[] = {
        {"txmsg test pull-data", test_txmsg_pull},
        {"txmsg test pop-data", test_txmsg_pop},
        {"txmsg test push/pop data", test_txmsg_push_pop},
-       {"txmsg text ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser},
+       {"txmsg test ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser},
+       {"txmsg test ingress parser2", test_txmsg_ingress_parser2},
 };
quoted
Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg
interface")
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Thank you for reviewing this patch again.

RE: [PATCH v4] skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress

From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-12 05:27:12

[...]
quoted
quoted
Thanks. Please add Fixes tags so we can track these I've added it here.

This has been broken from the initial patches and after a quick glance
I suspect this will need manual backports if we need it. Also all the
I use and all the selftests set parser to a nop by returning skb->len.

Can you also create a test so we can ensure we don't break this again?
Okay, I will do this after the holiday.

Hi John, 
I checked selftests, there are have one test case named " test_txmsg_ingress_parser".
But with this patch and ktls, the test failed, this because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value is 285 not 256.
the case like this: 
tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2
tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk recved 570 btyes data,
and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred.
I fix this as below:
Ah good catch.
quoted hunk
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -1680,6 +1680,8 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
 {
        txmsg_pass = 1;
        skb_use_parser = 512;
+       if (ktls == 1)
+               skb_use_parser = 570;
        opt->iov_length = 256;
        opt->iov_count = 1;
        opt->rate = 2;

And i add one new test as below, is it ok?

Yes looks good to me.
quoted hunk
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct sockmap_options {
        bool sendpage;
        bool data_test;
        bool drop_expected;
+       bool check_recved_len;
        int iov_count;
        int iov_length;
        int rate;
@@ -556,8 +557,12 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
        int err, i, flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL;
        bool drop = opt->drop_expected;
        bool data = opt->data_test;
+       int iov_alloc_length = iov_length;
 
-       err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_length, data, tx);
+       if (!tx && opt->check_recved_len)
+               iov_alloc_length *= 2;
+
+       err = msg_alloc_iov(&msg, iov_count, iov_alloc_length, data, tx);
        if (err)
                goto out_errno;
        if (peek_flag) {
@@ -665,6 +670,13 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 
                        s->bytes_recvd += recv;
 
+                       if (opt->check_recved_len && s->bytes_recvd > total_bytes) {
+                               errno = EMSGSIZE;
+                               fprintf(stderr, "recv failed(), bytes_recvd:%zd, total_bytes:%f\n",
+                                               s->bytes_recvd, total_bytes);
+                               goto out_errno;
+                       }
+
                        if (data) {
                                int chunk_sz = opt->sendpage ?
                                                iov_length * cnt :
@@ -744,7 +756,8 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt)
 
        rxpid = fork();
        if (rxpid == 0) {
-               iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1);
+               if (txmsg_pop || txmsg_start_pop)
+                       iov_buf -= (txmsg_pop - txmsg_start_pop + 1);
                if (opt->drop_expected || txmsg_ktls_skb_drop)
                        _exit(0);
 
@@ -1688,6 +1701,19 @@ static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
        test_exec(cgrp, opt);
 }
 
+static void test_txmsg_ingress_parser2(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt)
+{
+       if (ktls == 1)
+               return;
+       skb_use_parser = 10;
+       opt->iov_length = 20;
+       opt->iov_count = 1;
+       opt->rate = 1;
+       opt->check_recved_len = true;
+       test_exec(cgrp, opt);
+       opt->check_recved_len = false;
+}
+
 char *map_names[] = {
        "sock_map",
        "sock_map_txmsg",
@@ -1786,7 +1812,8 @@ struct _test test[] = {
        {"txmsg test pull-data", test_txmsg_pull},
        {"txmsg test pop-data", test_txmsg_pop},
        {"txmsg test push/pop data", test_txmsg_push_pop},
-       {"txmsg text ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser},
+       {"txmsg test ingress parser", test_txmsg_ingress_parser},
+       {"txmsg test ingress parser2", test_txmsg_ingress_parser2},
 };
Great, please post as a series.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help