On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 6:53 AM Hou Tao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Program on writable tracepoint is BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE,
but its attachment is the same as BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <redacted>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index ef5db34bf913..b874c0179084 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -7976,6 +7976,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
.attach_fn = attach_raw_tp),
SEC_DEF("raw_tp/", RAW_TRACEPOINT,
.attach_fn = attach_raw_tp),
+ SEC_DEF("raw_tracepoint.w/", RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE,
+ .attach_fn = attach_raw_tp),
+ SEC_DEF("raw_tp.w/", RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE,
+ .attach_fn = attach_raw_tp),
Unfortunately I just refactored these SEC_DEF() definitions, please
rebase because this won't apply cleanly anymore. Otherwise it looks
good to me.
SEC_DEF("tp_btf/", TRACING,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP,
.is_attach_btf = true,
--
2.29.2