Re: Redux: Backwards compatibility for XDP multi-buff
From: Lorenz Bauer <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-28 08:47:57
Also in:
bpf
On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 20:38, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Porting is only easy if we are guaranteed that the first PAGE_SIZE bytes (or whatever the current limit is) are available via ->data without trickery. Otherwise we have to convert all direct packet access to the new API, whatever that ends up being. It seemed to me like you were saying there is no such guarantee, and it could be driver dependent, which is the worst possible outcome imo. This is the status quo for TC classifiers, which is a great source of hard to diagnose bugs.Well, for the changes we're proposing now it will certainly be the case that the first PAGE_SIZE will always be present. But once we have the capability, I would expect people would want to do more with it, so we can't really guarantee this in the future. We could require that any other use be opt-in at the driver level, I suppose, but not sure if that would be enough?
I'm not sure what you mean by "opt-in at driver level"? Make smaller initial fragments a feature on the driver? We shouldn't let drivers dictate the semantics of a program type, it defeats the purpose of the context abstraction. We're using XDP precisely because we don't want to deal with vendor specific network stack bypass, etc. I would prefer not specifying the first fragment size over the driver knob, unfortunately it invalidates your assumption that porting is going to be trivial. Lorenz -- Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer 6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK www.cloudflare.com