Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2021-09-03

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add hardware timestamp field to __sk_buff

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2021-09-03 08:23:10
Also in: bpf

On 9/3/21 12:15 AM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
BPF programs may want to know hardware timestamps if NIC supports
such timestamping.

Expose this data as hwtstamp field of __sk_buff the same way as
gso_segs/gso_size.

Also update BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN tests of the feature.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <redacted>
---
  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  2 ++
  net/core/filter.c              | 11 +++++++++++
  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  2 ++
  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 791f31dd0abe..c7d05b49f557 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5284,6 +5284,8 @@ struct __sk_buff {
  	__u32 gso_segs;
  	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
  	__u32 gso_size;
+	__u32 padding;		/* Padding, future use. */
nit, instead of explicit padding field, just use: __u32 :32;

Also please add test_verifier coverage for this in BPF selftests, meaning,
the expectation would be in case someone tries to access the padding field
with this patch that we get a 'bpf verifier is misconfigured' error given
it would have no bpf_convert_ctx_access() translation. But it would be overall
better to add this to bpf_skb_is_valid_access(), so we can reject access to
the padding area right there instead.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	__u64 hwtstamp;
  };
  
  struct bpf_tunnel_key {
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 2e32cee2c469..1d8f8494d325 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -8884,6 +8884,17 @@ static u32 bpf_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
  				      si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
  				      offsetof(struct sk_buff, sk));
  		break;
+	case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hwtstamp):
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof_field(struct skb_shared_hwtstamps, hwtstamp) != 8);
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_shared_hwtstamps, hwtstamp) != 0);
+
+		insn = bpf_convert_shinfo_access(si, insn);
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW,
+				      si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
+				      bpf_target_off(struct skb_shared_info,
+						     hwtstamps, 8,
+						     target_size));
+		break;
  	}
  
  	return insn - insn_buf;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 791f31dd0abe..c7d05b49f557 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5284,6 +5284,8 @@ struct __sk_buff {
  	__u32 gso_segs;
  	__bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
  	__u32 gso_size;
+	__u32 padding;		/* Padding, future use. */
+	__u64 hwtstamp;
  };
  
  struct bpf_tunnel_key {
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help