Re: [PATCH v1 net] net: mscc: ocelot: remove buggy and useless write to ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Date: 2021-09-17 01:24:46
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:49:18AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
This will conflict with the other patch.... why didn't you send both as part of a series? By not doing that, you are telling patchwork to build-test them in parallel, which of course does not work: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210916012341.518512-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com/ Also, why didn't you bump the version counter of the patch, and we're still at v1 despite the earlier attempt?
I wasn't sure if changing the names of the patch and the intent is what would constitute a new "patch series" so then restart the counter for the counters or not. I had figured "two new patches, two new counters" which I understand now was incorrect. In this particular case, should I have stuck with my first submission title: [PATCH v2 net] bug fix when writing MAC speed and submitted the two patches? I assume it would only cause headaches if I incremented the counter and changed the name to something like [PATCH v2 net] remove unnecessary register writes or something simliar? Although your example below suggests I should maybe submit the next set as [PATCH v3 net] ocelot phylink fixes
git format-patch -2 --cover-letter --subject-prefix="PATCH v3 net" -o /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch # Go through patches, write change log compared to v2 using vimdiff, meld, git range-diff, whatever # Write cover letter summarizing what changes and why. If fixing bugs explain the impact. git send-email \ --to='netdev@vger.kernel.org' \ --to='linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org' \ --cc='Vladimir Oltean [off-list ref]' \ --cc='Claudiu Manoil [off-list ref]' \ --cc='Alexandre Belloni [off-list ref]' \ --cc='UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com' \ --cc='"David S. Miller" [off-list ref]' \ --cc='Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]' \ /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch
I've been using --to-cmd and --cc-cmd with get_maintainer.pl. If this is ill-advised, I'll stop. I noticed it seemed to determine the list on a per-patch-file basis instead of generating one single list.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Please keep this tag but resend a new version. You can download the patch with the review tags automatically using: git b4 20210916010938.517698-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com git b4 20210916012341.518512-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com where "git b4" is an alias configured like this in ~/.gitconfig: [b4] midmask = https://lore.kernel.org/r/%s [alias] b4 = "!f() { b4 am -t -o - $@ | git am -3; }; f"
Thank you for all this. I understand you have better things to do than to hold my hand through this process, so I greatly appreciate your help.