On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:12:42 +0800 Tianjia Zhang wrote:
+ memcpy(sm4_gcm_info->iv,
+ cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
+ TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_IV_SIZE);
+ memcpy(sm4_gcm_info->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
+ TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
+ release_sock(sk);
+ if (copy_to_user(optval, sm4_gcm_info, sizeof(*sm4_gcm_info)))
+ rc = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ case TLS_CIPHER_SM4_CCM: {
+ struct tls12_crypto_info_sm4_ccm *sm4_ccm_info =
+ container_of(crypto_info,
+ struct tls12_crypto_info_sm4_ccm, info);
+
+ if (len != sizeof(*sm4_ccm_info)) {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ memcpy(sm4_ccm_info->iv,
+ cctx->iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
+ TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_IV_SIZE);
+ memcpy(sm4_ccm_info->rec_seq, cctx->rec_seq,
+ TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_REC_SEQ_SIZE);
Doesn't matter from the functional perspective but perhaps use the SM4
defines rather than the AES ones, since they exist, anyway?
With that fixed feel free to add my ack.