[PATCH v3 28/32] staging: wfx: fix comments styles
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: 2021-09-13 13:06:24
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
Subsystem:
staging subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Linus Torvalds
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Unify all comments of the wfx driver to use the same comment style. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> --- drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c | 11 +++-------- drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c | 6 ++---- drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 3 +-- drivers/staging/wfx/main.h | 3 +-- drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c | 3 +-- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
index e956b5a5ccac..a0f9d1b53019 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c@@ -265,9 +265,7 @@ static void bh_work(struct work_struct *work) wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used, release_chip); } -/* - * An IRQ from chip did occur - */ +/* An IRQ from chip did occur */ void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev) { u32 cur, prev;
@@ -285,16 +283,13 @@ void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev) prev, cur); } -/* - * Driver want to send data - */ +/* Driver want to send data */ void wfx_bh_request_tx(struct wfx_dev *wdev) { queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &wdev->hif.bh); } -/* - * If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control +/* If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control * register and simulate an IRQ ahen an event happened. * * Note that the device has a bug: If an IRQ raise while host read control
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
index 61f73b3ebc80..55ffcd7c42e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c@@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ struct wfx_spi_priv { bool need_swab; }; -/* - * The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little +/* The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little * endian) CPU register. So, the chip expects bytes order to be "B1 B0 B3 B2" * (while LE is "B0 B1 B2 B3" and BE is "B3 B2 B1 B0") *
@@ -241,8 +240,7 @@ static int wfx_spi_remove(struct spi_device *func) return 0; } -/* - * For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only +/* For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only * use modalias and modalias is a copy of 'compatible' DT node with vendor * stripped. */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index c5ba0a50b474..98a9391b2bee 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c@@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static const char * const fwio_errors[] = { [ERR_MAC_KEY] = "MAC key not initialized", }; -/* - * request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with +/* request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with * underlying hardware that use DMA. Function below detect this case and * allocate a bounce buffer if necessary. *
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
index a0db322383a3..115abd2d4378 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ struct wfx_platform_data { const char *file_fw; const char *file_pds; struct gpio_desc *gpio_wakeup; - /* - * if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock + /* if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock * (intended to be used in 50Mhz SDIO) */ bool use_rising_clk;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
index 9e2d08317c9e..668ef2c60837 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c@@ -85,8 +85,7 @@ static int send_scan_req(struct wfx_vif *wvif, return ret; } -/* - * It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However, +/* It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However, * there is a bug in "iw scan" when ieee80211_scan_completed() is called before * wfx_hw_scan() return */
--
2.33.0