On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 05:11:42PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2021-09-07 15:54, Florian Westphal wrote:
quoted
quoted
- /* Try to get same port: if not, try to change it. */
- for (port = ntohs(exp->saved_proto.tcp.port); port != 0; port++) {
- int ret;
+ if (htons(nat->range_info.min_proto.all) == 0 ||
+ htons(nat->range_info.max_proto.all) == 0) {
Either use if (nat->range_info.min_proto.all || ...
or use ntohs(). I will leave it up to you if you prefer
ntohs(nat->range_info.min_proto.all) == 0 or
nat->range_info.min_proto.all == ntohs(0).
If one has the option, one should always prefer to put htons/htonl on
the side with the constant literal;
Propagation of constants and compile-time evaluation is the target.
That works for some other functions as well (e.g.
strlen("fixedstring")).
When comparing against constant zero, why use htons/htonl at all?
Cheers ... Duncan.