Re: [syzbot] WARNING: kmalloc bug in hash_net_create

On 9/3/21 4:50 PM, syzbot wrote:

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    a9c9a6f741cd Merge tag 'scsi-misc' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=117f0915300000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=1ac29107aeb2a552
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2b8443c35458a617c904
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12fba55d300000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=15bd2f49300000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+2b8443c35458a617c904@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8432 at mm/util.c:597 kvmalloc_node+0x111/0x120 mm/util.c:597
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 8432 Comm: syz-executor044 Not tainted 5.14.0-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:kvmalloc_node+0x111/0x120 mm/util.c:597
Code: 01 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 ed 11 0d 00 49 89 c5 e9 69 ff ff ff e8 90 55 d1 ff 41 89 ed 41 81 cd 00 20 01 00 eb 95 e8 7f 55 d1 ff <0f> 0b e9 4c ff ff ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd 53 e8 66
RSP: 0018:ffffc900018f7288 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc900018f73a0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88803d6ca300 RSI: ffffffff81a3f651 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000400dc0 R08: 000000007fffffff R09: 000000000000001f
R10: ffffffff81a3f60e R11: 000000000000001f R12: 0000000400000018
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: ffff88801743d000
FS:  0000000001d7c300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020000046 CR3: 000000001e0d4000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 hash_net_create+0x3dd/0x1220 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_gen.h:1524
 ip_set_create+0x782/0x15a0 net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c:1100
 nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0xbc9/0x13f0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:296
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
 nfnetlink_rcv+0x1ac/0x420 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:654
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409
 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463
 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x43f039
Code: 28 c3 e8 2a 14 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc97697a28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000400488 RCX: 000000000043f039
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200000c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000403020 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000400488
R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004030b0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000004ac018 R15: 0000000000400488


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

As mentioned to Linus earlier, this bug comes after recent patch

commit 7661809d493b426e979f39ab512e3adf41fbcc69
Author: Linus Torvalds [off-list ref]
Date:   Wed Jul 14 09:45:49 2021 -0700

    mm: don't allow oversized kvmalloc() calls
    
    'kvmalloc()' is a convenience function for people who want to do a
    kmalloc() but fall back on vmalloc() if there aren't enough physically
    contiguous pages, or if the allocation is larger than what kmalloc()
    supports.
    
    However, let's make sure it doesn't get _too_ easy to do crazy things
    with it.  In particular, don't allow big allocations that could be due
    to integer overflow or underflow.  So make sure the allocation size fits
    in an 'int', to protect against trivial integer conversion issues.
    
    Acked-by: Willy Tarreau [off-list ref]
    Cc: Kees Cook [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [off-list ref]