Re: [PATCH] net: tcp_drop adds `reason` parameter for tracing v2
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2021-09-01 17:44:25
Also in:
lkml
On September 1, 2021 11:20:58 AM EDT, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 7:36 AM Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:13:07 +1000 Brendan Gregg [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:20 PM Steven Rostedt[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:47:46 -0700 Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
@@ -5703,15 +5700,15 @@ static booltcp_validate_incoming(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk),TCP_MIB_INERRS);quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk),LINUX_MIB_TCPSYNCHALLENGE);quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk, skb); - goto discard; + tcp_drop(sk, skb, TCP_DROP_MASK(__LINE__,TCP_VALIDATE_INCOMING));quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'd rather use a string. So that we can more easily identify_why_ thequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
packet was drop, without looking at the source code of the exact kernel version to locate line number 1057 You can be sure that we will get reports in the future fromusers ofquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
heavily modified kernels. Having to download a git tree, or apply semi-private patches isa no go.quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
If you really want to include __FILE__ and __LINE__, these bothcan bequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
stringified and included in the report, with the help ofmacros.quoted
quoted
quoted
I agree the __LINE__ is pointless, but if this has a tracepoint involved, then you can simply enable the stacktrace trigger to itandquoted
quoted
quoted
it will save a stack trace in the ring buffer for you. echo stacktrace >/sys/kernel/tracing/events/tcp/tcp_drop/triggerquoted
quoted
quoted
And when the event triggers it will record a stack trace. You canalsoquoted
quoted
quoted
even add a filter to do it only for specific reasons. echo 'stacktrace if reason == 1' >/sys/kernel/tracing/events/tcp/tcp_drop/triggerquoted
quoted
quoted
And it even works for flags: echo 'stacktrace if reason & 0xa' >/sys/kernel/tracing/events/tcp/tcp_drop/triggerquoted
quoted
quoted
Which gives another reason to use an enum over a string.You can't do string comparisons? The more string support Ftracehas,quoted
quoted
the more convenient they will be. Using bpftrace as an example of convenience and showing drop frequency counted by human-readable reason and stack trace:Yes, you can (and pretty much always had this ability), but having flags is usually makes it easier (and faster). You can have 'stacktrace if reason ~ "*string*"' which will match anything with "string" in it. My main argument against strings is more of the space they take up in the ring buffer than the ability to filter.Understood the concern about size, but it seems the trace includes many things. Can we have an estimate of the size needed per event ? If we do not use symbolic, but numbers, I am afraid this trace event will only be used by a few TCP experts.
Note, the output is still text, not numeric, as the __print_symbolic() macro will convert the numbers to text. Or is there another issue you have with the enum? -- Steve
+ TP_printk("src=%pISpc dest=%pISpc mark=%#x data_len=%d
snd_nxt=%#x snd_una=%#x \
+ snd_cwnd=%u ssthresh=%u snd_wnd=%u
srtt=%u rcv_wnd=%u \
+ sock_cookie=%llx reason=%d
reason_type=%s reason_line=%d",
__entry->saddr, __entry->daddr, __entry->mark,
__entry->data_len, __entry->snd_nxt,
__entry->snd_una,
__entry->snd_cwnd, __entry->ssthresh,
__entry->snd_wnd,
- __entry->srtt, __entry->rcv_wnd,
__entry->sock_cookie, __entry->reason)
+ __entry->srtt, __entry->rcv_wnd,
__entry->sock_cookie,
+ __entry->reason,
+ __print_symbolic(__entry->reason_code,
TCP_DROP_REASON),
+ __entry->reason_line)
);-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity and top posting.