Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-09-01

Re: [PATCH][next] igc: remove redundant continue statement

flat view

From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Date: 2021-09-01 16:39:01
Also in: intel-wired-lan, kernel-janitors, lkml

Colin King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>

The continue statement at the end of a for-loop has no effect,
remove it.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
index 0f021909b430..b615a980f563 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c
@@ -860,7 +860,6 @@ static int igc_phc_get_syncdevicetime(ktime_t *device,
 			 * so write the previous error status to clear it.
 			 */
 			wr32(IGC_PTM_STAT, stat);
-			continue;
Just a bit of background.

I added the "continue" here more as documentation: we handled an error,
and we want to try again, I felt that the continue helps making that
clearer.

But I am not completely opposed about removing it.
 		}
 	} while (--count);
 
-- 
2.32.0
Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help