[PATCH net-next 6/6 v5] net: dsa: rtl8366: Drop and depromote pointless prints
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-24 23:39:10
Subsystem:
networking drivers, networking [dsa], the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Andrew Lunn, Vladimir Oltean, Linus Torvalds
We don't need a message for every VLAN association, dbg is fine. The message about adding the DSA or CPU port to a VLAN is directly misleading, this is perfectly fine. Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Cc: Mauri Sandberg <redacted> Cc: Alvin Šipraga <redacted> Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted> --- ChangeLog v4->v5: - Collect Florians review tag. ChangeLog v1->v4: - New patch to deal with confusing messages and too talkative DSA bridge. --- drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
index f815cd16ad48..bb6189aedcd4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c@@ -318,12 +318,9 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, return ret; } - dev_info(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n", - vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged", - pvid ? " PVID" : "no PVID"); - - if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port)) - dev_err(smi->dev, "port is DSA or CPU port\n"); + dev_dbg(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n", + vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged", + pvid ? " PVID" : "no PVID"); member |= BIT(port);
@@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv; int ret, i; - dev_info(smi->dev, "del VLAN %04x on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port); + dev_dbg(smi->dev, "del VLAN %d on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port); for (i = 0; i < smi->num_vlan_mc; i++) { struct rtl8366_vlan_mc vlanmc;
--
2.31.1