Hi!

quoted

Yes, this still persists. But we really do not want to start
introducing namespaces to the LED subsystem.

Did we come to any conclusion?

My preliminary r8169 implementation now creates the following LED names:

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 26 22:50 r8169-led0-0300 ->

quoted

../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/0000:03:00.0/net/enp3s0/r8169-led0-0300

So "r8159-0300:green:activity" would be closer to the naming we want,
but lets not do that, we really want this to be similar to what others
are doing, and that probably means "ethphy3:green:activity" AFAICT.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek