Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-23

Re: [net-next][bisected da41788] modules fails to build drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c:12199

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-08-23 06:39:11
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On 23.08.2021 08:00, Abdul Haleem wrote:
Greeting's

Todays net-next branch fails to build on my powerpc box with below error

  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_trace_points.o
  CC [M]  drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_ethtool.o
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c: In function ‘bnx2x_read_fwinfo’:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c:12199:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pci_vpd_alloc’; did you mean ‘pci_pool_alloc’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  vpd_data = pci_vpd_alloc(bp->pdev, &vpd_len);
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
             pci_pool_alloc
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c:12199:11: warning: assignment to ‘u8 *’ {aka ‘unsigned char *’} from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  vpd_data = pci_vpd_alloc(bp->pdev, &vpd_len);
           ^
  CC [M]  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nx.o
  CC [M]  net/netfilter/xt_MASQUERADE.o
  CC [M]  net/bluetooth/ecdh_helper.o
  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v5_0.o
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c:12203:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword’; did you mean ‘pci_vpd_find_info_keyword’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len,
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         pci_vpd_find_info_keyword
  CC [M]  net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.o
  CC [M]  net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.o
  CC [M]  net/mac80211/driver-ops.o


The recent changes to the code causing build fail is

commit da417885a99d36036cc7d2778f94b846e6582434
Author: Heiner Kallweit [off-list ref]
Date:   Sun Aug 22 15:54:23 2021 +0200

    bnx2x: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword()
        Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to
    simplify the code.
        str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same
    comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead.
        Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [off-list ref]

@Heiner, Could you please have a look, I am attaching the kernel config
This series was supposed to go via the PCI tree because it builds on patches
that are in the PCI tree but not in linux-next and net-next yet.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help