Thread (64 messages) 64 messages, 6 authors, 2021-08-24

Re: [PATCH V3 11/13] HV/IOMMU: Enable swiotlb bounce buffer for Isolation VM

From: Tianyu Lan <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-20 09:32:40
Also in: linux-arch, linux-hyperv, linux-iommu, linux-scsi, lkml, xen-devel


On 8/20/2021 2:11 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
quoted
  }
+
+/*
+ * hv_map_memory - map memory to extra space in the AMD SEV-SNP Isolation VM.
+ */
+void *hv_map_memory(void *addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long *pfns = kcalloc(size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
+				      sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
+	void *vaddr;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!pfns)
+		return NULL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
+		pfns[i] = virt_to_hvpfn(addr + i * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE) +
+			(ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+	vaddr = vmap_pfn(pfns, size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,	PAGE_KERNEL_IO);
+	kfree(pfns);
+
+	return vaddr;
+}
This function is manipulating page tables in the guest VM.  It is not involved
in communicating with Hyper-V, or passing PFNs to Hyper-V.  The pfn array
contains guest PFNs, not Hyper-V PFNs.  So it should use PAGE_SIZE
instead of HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, and similarly PAGE_SHIFT and virt_to_pfn().
If this code were ever to run on ARM64 in the future with PAGE_SIZE other
than 4 Kbytes, the use of PAGE_SIZE is correct choice.
OK. Will update with PAGE_SIZE.

quoted
+void __init hyperv_iommu_swiotlb_init(void)
+{
+	unsigned long bytes;
+
+	/*
+	 * Allocate Hyper-V swiotlb bounce buffer at early place
+	 * to reserve large contiguous memory.
+	 */
+	hyperv_io_tlb_size = 256 * 1024 * 1024;
A hard coded size here seems problematic.   The memory size of
Isolated VMs can vary by orders of magnitude.  I see that
xen_swiotlb_init() uses swiotlb_size_or_default(), which at least
pays attention to the value specified on the kernel boot line.

Another example is sev_setup_arch(), which in the native case sets
the size to 6% of main memory, with a max of 1 Gbyte.  This is
the case that's closer to Isolated VMs, so doing something
similar could be a good approach.
Yes, agree. It's better to keep bounce buffer size with AMD SEV.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help