Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-27

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] mptcp: Optimize received options handling

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-08-27 09:10:29
Also in: mptcp

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:44:49 -0700 you wrote:
These patches optimize received MPTCP option handling in terms of both
storage and fewer conditionals to evaluate in common cases, and also add
a couple of cleanup patches.

Patches 1 and 5 do some cleanup in checksum option parsing and
clarification of lock handling.

[...]
Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,1/5] mptcp: do not set unconditionally csum_reqd on incoming opt
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8d548ea1dd15
  - [net-next,2/5] mptcp: better binary layout for mptcp_options_received
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a086aebae0eb
  - [net-next,3/5] mptcp: consolidate in_opt sub-options fields in a bitmask
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/74c7dfbee3e1
  - [net-next,4/5] mptcp: optimize the input options processing
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f6c2ef59bcc7
  - [net-next,5/5] mptcp: make the locking tx schema more readable
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9758f40e90f7

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help