Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-13

Re: [PATCH net v2 3/4] bnxt: make sure xmit_more + errors does not miss doorbells

From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: 2021-08-11 23:01:38

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:44 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:36:34 -0700 Michael Chan wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -367,6 +368,13 @@ static u16 bnxt_xmit_get_cfa_action(struct sk_buff *skb)
        return md_dst->u.port_info.port_id;
 }

+static void bnxt_txr_db_kick(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_tx_ring_info *txr,
+                            u16 prod)
+{
+       bnxt_db_write(bp, &txr->tx_db, prod);
+       txr->kick_pending = 0;
+}
+
 static netdev_tx_t bnxt_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
        struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -396,6 +404,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t bnxt_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
        free_size = bnxt_tx_avail(bp, txr);
        if (unlikely(free_size < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 2)) {
                netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
+               if (net_ratelimit() && txr->kick_pending)
+                       netif_warn(bp, tx_err, dev, "bnxt: ring busy!\n");
You forgot to remove this.
I changed my mind. I added the && txr->kick_pending to the condition,
if there is a race and napi starts the queue unnecessarily the kick
can't be pending.
I don't understand.  The queue should be stopped if we have <=
MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 descriptors left.  If there is a race and the queue
is awake, the first TX packet may slip through if
skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags is small and we have enough descriptors for
it.  Let's say xmit_more is set for this packet and so kick is
pending.  The next packet may not fit anymore and it will hit this
check here.
quoted
quoted
                return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
        }
@@ -516,21 +526,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t bnxt_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 normal_tx:
        if (length < BNXT_MIN_PKT_SIZE) {
                pad = BNXT_MIN_PKT_SIZE - length;
-               if (skb_pad(skb, pad)) {
+               if (skb_pad(skb, pad))
                        /* SKB already freed. */
-                       tx_buf->skb = NULL;
-                       return NETDEV_TX_OK;
-               }
+                       goto tx_kick_pending;
                length = BNXT_MIN_PKT_SIZE;
        }

        mapping = dma_map_single(&pdev->dev, skb->data, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

-       if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(&pdev->dev, mapping))) {
-               dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
-               tx_buf->skb = NULL;
-               return NETDEV_TX_OK;
-       }
+       if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(&pdev->dev, mapping)))
+               goto tx_free;

        dma_unmap_addr_set(tx_buf, mapping, mapping);
        flags = (len << TX_BD_LEN_SHIFT) | TX_BD_TYPE_LONG_TX_BD |
@@ -617,13 +622,15 @@ static netdev_tx_t bnxt_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
        txr->tx_prod = prod;

        if (!netdev_xmit_more() || netif_xmit_stopped(txq))
-               bnxt_db_write(bp, &txr->tx_db, prod);
+               bnxt_txr_db_kick(bp, txr, prod);
+       else
+               txr->kick_pending = 1;

 tx_done:

        if (unlikely(bnxt_tx_avail(bp, txr) <= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) {
                if (netdev_xmit_more() && !tx_buf->is_push)
-                       bnxt_db_write(bp, &txr->tx_db, prod);
+                       bnxt_txr_db_kick(bp, txr, prod);

                netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
@@ -661,7 +668,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t bnxt_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
                               PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
        }

+tx_free:
        dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+tx_kick_pending:
+       tx_buf->skb = NULL;
I think we should remove the setting of tx_buf->skb to NULL in the
tx_dma_error path since we are setting it here now.
But tx_buf gets moved IIRC - if we hit tx_dma_error tx_buf will be one
of the fragment bufs at this point. It should be legal to clear the skb
pointer on those AFAICT.
Ah, you're right.
Are you suggesting to do something along the lines of:

        txr->tx_buf_ring[txr->tx_prod].skb = NULL;
Yeah, I like this the best.
?
quoted
quoted
+       if (txr->kick_pending)
+               bnxt_txr_db_kick(bp, txr, txr->tx_prod);
        return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 }

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help